Paper Title
Guidelines for Enhancing The Efficiency of The Human Research Ethics Review Process At Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

Abstract
According to international standards on human research, aiming to provide protection for participants involved in research projects, it is mandated that organizations engaging in human research to establish an Institutional Review Board (IRB) responsible for screening research works and promoting and enhancing the protection, rights, safety, and well-being of volunteers participating in human research. This responsibility encompasses the development of a comprehensive system for the ethical oversight of human research, aligning with internationally recognized principles of research ethics for example the Declaration of Helsinki in 1964, the International Conference on Harmonization, Guidance on Good Clinical Practices (ICH GCP), and especially the Belmont Report. The Belmont Report serves as a foundational principle for project evaluation. Submitting incomplete research proposals, filling in ethics review application forms with ambiguous information, and presenting draft research plans with unclear details, such as sample group characteristics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, research tool descriptions, etc., can be significantly problematic. Sometimes, essential documents such as information forms and consent forms which the research participants require to fill in, are either missing or incomplete. Incomplete documentation creates issues for qualified experts who evaluate various research projects, as they may find the research lacks crucial information for an effective assessment. As a result, it is crucial to request additional documents from researchers, which adversely affect the delays in the review process or create obstacles or challenges to researchers from collecting data for research analysis on time. After researchers identified various problems, they actively seek to find the solutions to address the problems. Therefore, researchers have developed guidelines for documents preparation used for submission to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) for human research ethics review. These guidelines provide explicit and mandatory recommendations on how to address each section, explaining how to complete in precise formats. The researchers have carried out to disseminate these guidelines for recommended practices of documentation used in research proposal for human research ethics review to a variety of units. As a result of extensive publication, the solid understanding is broadly established among researchers. Keywords - Research, Human Research Ethics