Paper Title
Mediation as an Alternative to Courts in the Settlement of Civil and Commercial Disputes

Abstract
The general principle is that the solution of civil and commercial disputes shall be through the judiciary. The judicial structure needs specialized agents from different activities to assist the judiciary in deciding on But because of the slow and complex nature of the judicial proceedings, the dispute may take a long time and more costs, such as experts, lawyers, judicial fees, and other expenses, as well as hatred between the individual For the logical and legal reasons, that the judiciary seeks to reach the judicial truth, which may be concurrence of the truth and may be real, and may be different The mediation came to solve these problems, through the third party to study the dispute and develop a solution and settlement that satisfies the parties to the conflict. The parties agree to appoint a person called the mediator whose mission is to limit the dispute through communication between the parties, individually and collectively, in order to bring each party closer together so that they meet and agree on a compromise between them. Mediation is therefore a voluntary process by its very nature. The mediator can not make a firm decision on the basis of the dispute. Rather, his role is limited to trying to bring the views of the parties or parties closer together and to offer alternative solutions to them without imposing on them. Index Terms - Dispute, judicial, Mediation, solution